The Type 26 design is progressing
towards finalization, but there are nonetheless noticeable changes from what
was showcased at Euronaval 2012: the most evident is change is the return of
the Chinook-capable flight deck, which was a feature of the very first Type 26
design, but not of the 2012 variant, which instead had a shorter deck, limited
to the Merlin. The larger flight deck comes with “wells” at the corners (again
like in the very first design) to hide the docking equipment from the radar and
to provide machine gun positions for self defence of the platform.
The return of the huge flight deck
is not without consequences: the whole superstructure was moved ahead by a fair
bit to accomodate a larger flight deck, and this means a more
"cramped" bow. A raised protection to shield the VLS missile cells on
the bow from the waves has in fact appeared, and the Strike Lenght cells have
reduced in number, from 24 to 16.
If the large flight deck is a requirement on which the MOD is unwilling to make
compromises, the price the pay is a reduction in VLS cells (and, but hopefully
no, perhaps a reduction in the size of the mission bay too?). Frankly, while
unpleasant, it is not that surprising. The Type 26 is no longer the 6 or 7000
tons leviathan once envisaged. It is only going to be some 3 to 4 meters longer
than an italian FREMM, and it is supposed to displace up to one thousand tons
less, while coming with a huge range (so lots of fuel), a 60 days logistic
endurance and a mission bay for up to 11 containers or up to four 11.5 meter
boats and a few containers, plus accommodation for some 190 people.
There is no space to spare, in other words. Fitting it all in 148 meters and
5400 tons is quite a big feat in itself.
BAE has released a fantastic new
video which also shows us the very first official images of the boat area,
showing the massive doors on the two sides, the four 11.5 meters boats, a
storage module roughly equivalent to a couple of 20’ containers in the middle
and “grabber” motion-stabilized cranes like those mounted on Type 45. The ones
on Type 26, however, will obviously have different arms, different size and
different lift capacity, all much greater than on the 45s.
A second, smaller opening in the
port side of the ship is also visible, which might be an access point to the
hangar and to the rest of the mission deck, but at the moment there are no
details about it.
Another easily noticeable change is
a modification in the arrangement of the CAMM missile cells in the funnel mast
area. The number of cells (24) is unchanged, but they have been moved back
towards the stern, to a position more “clean” of the funnel itself.
The new images released by BAE, showing the current design
The photos of the model on show at DSEI, by Navy Recognition, show the return of the Chinook-sized flight deck and the reduction in the number of the VLS Strike Lenght cells. Unchanged is the number of CAMM cells, 48 in total.
BAE Systems has chosen the first
sub-contractors: Rolls Royce, as expected, is in to supply the MT30 gas turbine
(1 per ship) and, together with Daimler as part of the TOGNUM joint venture, to
provide the MTU diesel generators (4 per ship). The propulsion arrangement is
confirmed as CODLOG.
BAE and the MOD are also planning to
begin work on in-service support arrangements for the new frigate class before
it is even built: significant economic efficiencies could be obtained by giving
stone-like stability to the programme from the very start, ordering a full
block of 13 sets of major subsystems and also agreeing a 10-year support deal.
See: http://www.shephardmedia.com/news/mil-log/dsei-2013-bae-system-initiates-type-26-support/
There is growing foreign interest in
the Type 26, too: talks are ongoing with 8 different countries, with combined
requirements worth up to 30 vessels. Of course, it remains an uphill struggle
for so many reasons, but I think it’s been a long time since a british warship
has been so much at the center of international interest: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...-interest.html
UPDATE: Navy Recognition has a video interview with Geoff Searle, program director for the Type 26. In the interview, he confirms that the Mission Bay can be used to embark "around 10 containers", or four large boats, but it could also be used to extend the capacity of the hangar to support embarkation of UAVs.
A less pleasant news, not really surprising, is that there is not yet a clear plan for arming the Strike Lenght cells of the Type 26. Tomahawk remains an obvious option, but replacing Harpoon with a vertical launch, multi-role missile will have to become a priority in coming years, if we want these warships to actually be capable of doing their job.
CAMM missile production order
The MOD, in the meanwhile, has
placed a 250 million contract to begin the production of the CAMM missile,
which will arm the Type 23 frigates from 2016 as a replacement for Sea Wolf,
and will then move on to the Type 26: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/r...ns-500-uk-jobs
MBDA and Lochkeed Martin announce successful CAMM launch from MK41 cell
In record time, MBDA and Lochkeed Martin have made a successful CAMM launch from a MK41 VLS cell using the Extensible Launching System (ExLS)
The ExLS launcher is built of lightweight composite structure attached
with drop-in/snap-in connectors and mechanical interfaces as the
existing canisters. The launcher features Open System Architecture and
Open Software and Cell Based Electronics for rapid interface with the
ship's combat management system.
This design enables the rapid
deployment of completely assembled weapons and munitions, such as the
Nulka, developed BAE Systems Australia, RAM Block II short range air
defense missiles or Precision Attack Missiles (PAM), to augment
traditional weapons designed for the VLS missions – such as the Standard
SM-2 and 3 and Tomahawk, Evolved Sea Sparrow (ESS) and Anti-Submarine
VL-ASROC weapon.
Computer graphic image of ExLS modules carrying: 4x NULKA countermeasure rounds, a NLOS-LS missile launch box and RAMBLK2. The ExLS is slotted inside normal MK41 VLS cells and allows the speedy integration of different missile systems with their own All-Up Round canisters. CAMM has now been demonstrated in a similar arrangement, with four missiles packed into a MK41 cell.
A stand-alone ExLS three-cell launcher for CAMM is being developed for ships too small to employ MK41 VLS systems, so MBDA and Lochkeed are both evidently convinced they are in for significant international interest.
There is still time to remove the "CAMM-only" missile cells from the bow silo of Type 26 frigates and replace with 16 more MK41 cells... If there is enough space (depth-wise, critically) in the Type 26 hull for doing it, adding sixteen more MK41 Strike lenght cells would be a dramatic improvement and increase in flexibility. 6 quad-packed cells could still take all of the planned 24 CAMM rounds, and still offer 10 more cells for other weapons, including Tomahawk.
A decision on the new Royal Navy's Medium Gun should be made next year
The MOD has received the two final offers, one by BAE / United Defense with the MK45 Mod 4 127/62 mm gun, and one by Oto Melara / Babcock with the 127/64 LW.
BAE's offer includes the Standard Guided Projectile; and Oto Melara counters with the VULCANO guided long range family of shells, along with the highly automated ammunition magazine.
For details of the guns and ammunition, see here: http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.it/2013/07/a-new-golden-era-for-naval-guns.html
Report by AviationWeek: http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ad3e6ae5f-fc91-4f63-ae93-7b57c99bb5ba
Planning for Carrier Enabled Power Projection
The Royal Navy is finalizing new plans for the Air Wing packages for the new aircraft carriers, keeping in mind the (hopefully only initial) size of the F35 fleet and the need to integrate the LPH role in the tasks of the carrier.
This means coming up with a "Fleet Carrier" package which would include 24 F35B, 9 Merlin HM2 in ASW role and a further 4 or 5 in AEW role; as well as with a Littoral Maneuver / LHA package which would add to a squadron of F35Bs the support of Merlin HC4, Chinook, Wildcat and Apache helicopters.
This planning work affects the final organisation of the flight deck. Helicopter operations spots, once planned to be only in six huge areas will be rearranged to achieve up to 10 spots to aid the ability to launch a reinforced company of Marines (up to 250) in a single wave of medium helicopters (Merlin HC4).
Important contracts expected in the fighter jets arena
Ministers at DSEI indicated that they expect to confirm the first large order for F35B jets for the first frontline squadron (617 Sqn RAF) in the coming months.
Always in the "coming months" they expect that a contract for the launch of actual AESA radar initiative for the Typhoon will be finally signed and announced.
In addition, minister Dunne downplayed the possibility of the UK adopting a split-type order of F35s jets, when quizzed about the speculated british interest for the F35A variant.
Typhoon AESA contract due in the coming months. Land-attack capability "must be there when Tornado is retired"
Much needed reassurances about Typhoon have been given by minister Dunne and by important RAF officers:
Speaking at the DSEI 2013
defence and security exhibition in London, Minister for Defence Equipment &
Technology Philip Dunne - who is heading to a meeting of his counterparts from
Germany, Italy and Spain on 13 September - described the E-Scan radar as the
"essential prerequisite for successful export of Typhoon".
"We are working with
our partners in four nations and the [industrial] consortium to button this
down," said Dunne on 11 September. "I am confident we will achieve
success and get a contract in a reasonable time frame, not many months from
now."
Eurofighter executives had
hoped to secure agreement of the formal launch of the Captor-E AESA radar -
which is currently being developed by a consortium led by Selex Galileo,
containing Cassidian and Indra - last year but the four Eurofighter partners
could not agree on how to proceed. The UK has launched its own AESA radar
demonstrator project with Selex Galileo, dubbed Bright Adder, as a fallback
solution but it is now expected to be subsumed in the Captor-E project after it
is formally launched.
RAF officers are relieved
the deadlock and delay that had dogged the Typhoon AESA project is coming to an
end, and hope the progress will open the way to further upgrades to the
aircraft. This includes the integration of additional air-to-ground weapons and
sensors on the Typhoon, beyond the existing suite of Raytheon Paveway
multi-mode guided bombs and Rafael Litening III advanced targeting pod.
The RAF is simultaneously
working to align its budget and plans for upgrading the Typhoon with the
international Captor-E project. Speaking at DSEI on 10 September, Air Commodore
Guy van der Berg, Assistant Chief of Staff Capability (Planning) at
Headquarters RAF Air Command, said: "We are looking to make progress on
the E-Scan radar in this planning round and will be briefing industry in the
next financial year."
Air Commodore Gary
Waterfall, commander Typhoon Force at RAF Coningsby, said that in an
"unpredictable world" it was important that the Typhoon stays at the
heart of the RAF. "When the Panavia
Tornado GR.4 retires at the end of the decade, the Typhoon has to be ready to
replace the Tornado GR.4's capability. Typhoon needs the same capability as the
Tornado GR.4 today," stated Air Cdre Waterfall.
"We don't have a fixed
date [for additional capabilities to be integrated on Typhoon] to keep the
programme as flexible and adaptable as possible. We are working hard to get the
MBDA Storm Shadow [stand-off missile] and a smaller family of weapons with low
collateral damage capabilities on Typhoon."
This later weapon is
understood to be the MBDA Brimstone missile and the enhanced derivative, the
Selective Precision Effects At Range (SPEAR) Capability 2 Block 1 weapon (known as Brimstone 2). This
is undergoing development and scheduled to enter service by the end of the year
on the Tornado GR.4. It will then migrate to the Typhoon.
James Fisher Defence presents new swimmer delivery vehicles for special forces
These new toys will sure have the eye of SEAL and Special Boat Service personnel: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_09_10_2013_p0-615021.xml
Chief Air Staff Andrew Pulford seems
to be well aware of the critical importance of the ISTAR fleet the RAF has
built up during the Iraq and Afghanistan operations. Along with air
vice-marshal Stuart D. Atha, he has provided some very strong evidence of his
intention to preserve and bring into core the various capabilities. Sentinel
R1, Shadow R1 (a sixth airplane is on the way to entry in service) and Reaper
are all capabilities that the RAF needs and wants. Holding on to them will be a
big objective for the service.
UPDATE: in order to secure funding for the Reaper, the RAF is considering whether it can meet the SCAVENGER requirement, while also studying the possibility of adapting the platform's sensors to make them useful for surface maritime surveillance, helping in closing the situational awareness gap left by the loss of Nimrod. Another option is to get the MOD and Treasury to agree on making Reaper an element of the long-term british presence in Afghanistan, to be known as Operation TORAL, at the end of the current HERRICK operations. If Reaper was ordered to stay in support of the ANA and of the british and allied presence in the Helmand province, UOR funding might continue. See the report by AviationWeek here: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_09_11_2013_p0-615465.xml&p=1
Maritime Patrol Aircraft: sights set on the SDSR 2015
The lack of an MPA capability is recognized as the most serious gap in capability, and the SDSR 2015 must look at the issue and make choices.
If an MPA programme is launched by the SDSR, Seedcorn will be inglobated within the project to prepare the crews for the new platform, otherwise it will be terminated by 2016.
Multi-mission capability and role flexibility are seen as major requirements for the new platform: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_09_12_2013_p0-615385.xml&p=1
Sentinel R1 offered as a maritime surveillance asset
Raytheon and the RAF are becoming "allies" in campaigning for software mods that would enable the Sentinel R1 radar to survey surface maritime targets, including very small, very hard to see objcts such as periscopes.
They are also campaigning to add more sensors (probably an electro-optic sensor turret, i'd guess) to "expand the capability of the airplane". But since the Sentinel R1 had to make do without the once-planned Air to Air refuelling probe because of weight issues, we can safely warn that weight growth margins are very tight.
In any case, there's no way to add ASW capability and the pylons for the employment of any kind of anti-sub torpedo and/or anti-ship missile, so the solution would be very, very limited.
This looks more like a way to secure long term funding for the Sentinel R1 than a genuine attempt to solve the MPA problem.
My readers know that my position is clear: Sentinel is precious and MUST be retained.
But it is not and will never be an MPA, and the RAF shouldn't sell it as such just to secure the funding, while leaving the Navy in trouble with the remaining gap in ASW long-range surveillance.
Anyway, report here, by Jane's 360: http://www.janes.com/article/26917/dsei-2013-raytheon-proposes-maritime-patrol-sentinel-r-1
Scan Eagle will take longer than expected
Despite being a Contractor-Owned and Contractor-Operated system, the Scan Eagle detachments procured as UOR for the Royal Navy will still require at least a small number of trained RN personnel, to provide a safety certification of contractor operations and, crucially, to analyze the data and picture coming in from the unmanned vehicle.
The Navy currently has almost no personnel at all experienced in UAV operations, and training even the small number needed is likely to require more than the six months once planned.
According to evidence provided by minister Robathan to the defence committee, Scan Eagle should enter service on the Bay-class LSD used as MCM mothership in the Gulf only by January 2014.
See report by AviationWeek on the manning challenge: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_09_10_2013_p0-614962.xml&p=2
AgustaWestland concept for a RWUAS
AgustaWestland's stand shows a concept for a new Rotary Wing Unmanned Air System. The Royal Navy has a requirement for the future acquisition of a machine of this kind, and has signed a contract with AgustaWestland which will result in trials of the SW-4 SOLO optionally piloted helicopter on a Type 23 frigate in October 2014.
This concept art shows how a more mature RWUAS might look by around 2020, when the RN would like to acquire this capability. Report by AviationWeek: http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a79a838cf-118b-471b-9840-0a1650e93d41
Synthetic training call; next SDSR must resolve maritime patrol capability problem
Pulford also signals that next SDSR
needs to take wise decisions regarding national ambition and, with it,
decisions on restoring the invaluable Maritime Patrol Capability lost with
Nimrod.
The british army will get a further
24 Foxhound vehicles, bringing the total of machines on order to 400. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/more-foxhound-vehicles-for-british-army
ACCOLADE decoy round development
Image by THALES showing the firing trial at Salisbury Plain
THALES and ASV have showcased their
HALCYONE optionally-manned boat. This 11.5 meters craft, capable of speeds of
roughly 30 knots, is meant to carry and/or tow mine-detection sonars. It can
also be fitted with a launch and recovery system that can put into the water
Unmanned Underwater Vehicles both for search and for disposal of mines. The
HALCYONE shown at DSEI is coupled with SAAB Seaeye UUVs for the underwater
search and identification of mines, and with the SAAB Hydra which is a
multi-shot mine neutralization UUV.
The Hydra can neutralize up to three
mines in a single mission, at the end of which it can be recovered and reloaded
for a subsequent mission: a big improvement over the current Seafox C, which
self-destructs in order to neutralize a mine, after the re-usable Seafox I
round has found and identified them!
HALCYONE can also two combined
influence sweep equipment. These capabilities make HALCYONE a perfect fit for
the MOD requirement (dating back to 2005 in its first form!) to promive a
stand-off replacement sweep capability to make up for the withdrawal from
service of the combined sweep kit once part of the Hunt-class equipment.
HALCYONE (top) and the SAAB Hydra
The MOD has earlier explored and
trialed an unmanned boat with similar roles and capabilities, under a 2007
contract with ATLAS: the resulting craft, based on a Combat Support Boat, has
been trialed since 2009 under the name Flexible Agile Sweeping Technology
(FAST).
FAST during a recent demonstration. Born to tow sweeping kit, FAST has evolved a lot, and here is fitted with a launch system for the SEAFOX disposal drone. Image by Mer et Marine
An old image showing the proposed modification for the Hunt minesweepers. Two FAST crafts would be carried, with a crane for launch and recovery. HALCYONE would most likely be carried in this same general arrangement.
HALCYONE, FAST, or a system closely
related to them, is expected to be part of the MHPC solution planned to start
entering service in 2018. The MOD plans to modify the current Hunt minesweepers
with the capability to launch and recovery a couple of such unmanned surface
vehicles, while wholly new vessels for the replacement of Hunt and Sandown
minesweepers are not expected before 2028.
UPDATE: always at DSEI, ATLAS is indeed responding with the Remote Combined Influence Sweeping System (ARCIMS), a similar system, optionally manned, 11 meters long and with a declared speed higher than 4 knots. ARCIMS has already received an order for two crafts, by an as-yet unnamed customer.
BAE Systems announced that it is
possible to convert the BAE 146 into a cheap tactical / training air tanker,
equipping it with a centerline system in the fuselage for the deployment of one
hose. BAE says that a lightweight boom could also be developed, on request.
The transferable fuel carried is, of
course, far, far away from the well over 100 tons on a Voyager: 7000 kg of fuel
can be passed on if only the standard fuel tanks are employed, rising to around
18.000 kg if additional tanks are installed in the cargo cabin.
The RAF has got two Bae 146 Mk3 now,
in Quick Change configuration: they can be fitted with seats for troops, or
used for the transport of pallets of cargo, or a combination of seats and
cargo. They have been procured as UOR to support operations in Afghanistan, and
as such, they currently can’t say to have a safe, certain future: they might be
simply scrapped as soon as operations in Afghanistan end and UOR funding from
the Treasury dries up.
The RAF has also a future problem at
hand, however: replacing the C130 and tanker permanently based on the
Falklands. Of course, deploying one Voyager and one A400 is a possible
solution, but it looks quite expensive both in terms of money, logistics and
sheer number of assets (the Falklands based assets would have to come from
fleets of just 9 core tankers and just 22 transports, after all). Another
possible solution would be two A400, with one AAR kit on one of the two, which
would present some serious logistics advantages, but not really solve the
problem of having too few assets of all types.
That’s where the Bae 146 MK3 might get a chance: if the range and transferable
fuel capability of the BAE 146 are assessed as sufficient, there might be an
interesting future post-afghanistan for the two MK3s, in the Falklands. See: http://www.shephardmedia.com/news/mi...ng-variant-ba/
UPDATE: FRES SV progress and problems; Mobile Test Rig on show
The Mobile Test Rig is undergoing rigorous, demanding tests, and will have to demonstrate its worth and reliability before the six planned SV Family prototypes are produced and rolled out for testing.
Unfortunately, no news on whether the MOD did expand the "Block 1" family, as proposed in the Planning Round period, to include the Ambulance and Command Post variants (initially part of the Block 2 family of vehicles, that would only follow on later).
Army Recognition has the photos and the details: http://www.armyrecognition.com/dsei_2013_show_daily_news_coverage_report/general_dynamics_uk_unveils_mtr_mobile_test_rig_precursor_of_prototype_sv_specialist_vehicle_1109131.html
Defense News is reporting that development has hit issues, including excess weight that will have to be shaved off the vehicle. http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130914/DEFREG01/309140009/GD-Pay-Lockheed-Millions-Over-Vehicle-Requirements-Delay
SELEX ES contracts
SELEX ES and ULTRA CSS will deliver thermal, day-night cameras for the Situational Awareness fit on Warrior CSP. The current contract is for 13 sets, to be used on the Warrior upgrade prototypes. SELEX will supply the Driver's Night Vision System 4 (DNVS4), while ULTRA CSS will deliver HUBE situational awareness day-night cameras that will be installed on the upgraded Warrior to provide 360° field of view around the vehicle, day and night.
SELEX ES has also been contracted for supporting the GSA8 gunfire direction system installed on the Type 23 frigates. This optical sensor turret includes the General Purpose Electro-Optics Director (GPEOD) which is used to direct the fire of the 4.5 inch MK8 Mod 1 main gun. The GPEOD is also used as a general purpose situational awareness day-night sensor.
Finally, SELEX ES will provide the Royal Navy with 18 Hawk - S medium-wave thermal imaging cameras that will replace the ALBATROSS sensor on part of the DS30M Automated Small Calibre Gun System turrets.
The Hawk-S is a new generation thermal imaging product, that will provide enhanced capability to the 30 mm gun mounts on some of the RN ships. It is fair to expect further orders in the future if the product proves its worth.
THALES provides demonstration of Generic Vehicle Architecture advantages
Thales has displayed a representative "pod" fitted with the basic GVA-compliant system used on British Army Foxhound, and demonstrated how easy it is to readily add and integrate additional capabilities, adding RWS, mast-mounted sensor, more powerful cameras for 360° Situational Awareness and other devices.
The GVA project of the british army is a major technological effort to ensure that new platform can be constantly upgaded and given new capabilites through life, while containing the time and expenses needed. See report: http://www.shephardmedia.com/news/digital-battlespace/thales-showcases-electronic-architecture-gva/
C-Trunk unveils the THOR
This catamaran craft could be a contender in the race for supplying the Royal Marines with a Force Protection Craft, which will also replace a part of the LCVP Mk5 fleet.
THOR as demonstrated at DSEI, in a photo by navyrecognition.com
Kelvin Hughes showcases new SharpEye solutions
KH has made a major effort on showcasing new applications and solutions for the SharpEye navigation and surveillance radar. The Royal Navy has already selected this powerful radar for installation on the new MARS FT tankers, and is working to validate it as NASAR (Navigation and Surveillance Radar), for the future replacement of the Type 1007 navigation radar across the whole fleet.
SharpEye has been fitted to RFA Argus, where it has demonstrated its capability in controlling and directing helicopter operations as well. Another SharpEye set is being evaluated on board RFA Fort Victoria to specifically assess its capability in detecting FIAC-type surface threats.
While the Thales proposal remains the same (retaining CERBERUS mission system and Searchwater AEW radar), the Lochkeed Martin VIGILANCE offer is making progress, but does not yet include a firm choice on the radar. Lochkeed, in fact, has test-flown the Mission System and the pods destined to contain the radar antennas and IFF system on a Merlin HM2, but the Northrop Grumman AESA radar which was expected to be inside the pods was not there. Northrop's radar, a development of the AN/APG-80 radar (which might or might not include features of the AN/APG-81 radar used on the F35) remains a contender, but Lochkeed has not yet firmly decided which radar will be offered inside the pods.
The MOD, on its part, has ordered both Thales and LM to consider four different radars: Searchwater, the Northrop AESA, an unspecified Selex ES product and an ELTA radar.
The most welcome news is that the RN is working hard to try and obtain a significant speed up of the whole program. While Main Gate remains officially expected in 2017, the RN is hoping to revert the planned date back to 2014, with a system selection in 2015 and entry in service in 2018.
There would still be a capability gap of some two years in this way (the Sea King ASaC is to bow out of service in 2016), but the AEW skills of the current crews would be preserved and employed in the CROWSNEST development and validation, instead of being lost.
A Main Gate in 2017 would come too late to avoid the loss of precious AEW skills honed by years of operations, including in Afghanistan, unless a new Seedcorn initiative is developed, sending navy crews abroad, or at least on RAF Sentry aircrafts.
Report by AIN Online: http://ainonline.com/aviation-news/ain-defense-perspective/2013-09-13/contenders-vie-british-aew-helicopter-system?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
